Does a Tokenized Asset Meet the Legal Definition of a Security?
Understanding Securities Classification in Tokenization
The classification of a tokenized asset as a security or a non-security is a critical legal determination that depends on how the token is structured and the rights it grants to investors. While certain assets—such as real estate, commodities, or collectibles—are not inherently securities, the process of tokenization can alter their legal status, making them subject to securities regulations.
Why Real Estate is Not a Security, but a Real Estate-Backed Token May Be
Real estate, when owned directly, is classified as a physical asset and does not fall under securities laws. However, when ownership, income rights, or investment in real estate is tokenized and offered to investors, the legal status of the token changes based on its structure and function.
A real estate-backed token can become a security if it meets the definition of a security under national and international financial regulations. The primary factors that determine whether a tokenized asset qualifies as a security include:
The economic rights attached to the token – Does the token give investors passive ownership, voting rights, or dividend payments?
How the token is marketed to investors – Is it sold as an investment opportunity with expected profits?
Investor reliance on a central entity – Does the token’s value depend on the management efforts of a third party?
In many jurisdictions, these elements align with the legal definition of a security, even if the underlying asset itself is not a security.
How Securities Laws Apply to Tokenized Real Estate
The legal status of a tokenized real estate asset is determined by financial regulators using established legal tests. Below are key legal frameworks used to classify security tokens:
The Howey Test (United States - SEC)
In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) uses the Howey Test to determine whether an asset qualifies as a security. Under this test, an asset-backed token is a security if it meets the following four criteria:
An investment of money – Investors contribute funds to acquire the token.
In a common enterprise – Investors pool their money into a shared investment (e.g., a real estate fund or fractional property ownership).
With an expectation of profit – Investors anticipate returns through rental income, capital appreciation, or dividends.
Primarily from the efforts of others – The token issuer, property manager, or a third party handles property management, revenue distribution, and appreciation strategies.
If a real estate-backed token is structured to distribute passive income from rental yields or capital appreciation, it is likely to be classified as a security in the U.S.
MiFID II & MiCA (European Union)
The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) and Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) provide the regulatory framework for classifying tokenized financial instruments in the European Union.
MiFID II defines a security as a transferable instrument that represents ownership, debt, or investment rights in an asset.
If a real estate token is freely tradeable, provides profit-sharing rights, or operates similarly to a financial instrument, it is subject to securities regulations.
MiCA will regulate crypto-assets that do not fall under MiFID II but still provide investment-related functions.
FCA Classification (United Kingdom)
The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) follows a similar securities classification approach:
If a real estate-backed token functions as an investment product, it is treated as a security token.
If the token represents pure ownership rights without a structured investment scheme, it may not be classified as a security.
Other International Securities Tests
Singapore (MAS - Monetary Authority of Singapore) – Follows securities classification under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA).
Switzerland (FINMA - Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority) – Regulates real estate-backed tokens based on their investment nature.
United Arab Emirates (VARA & ADGM) – Requires classification and licensing for tokenized real estate securities.
When a Real Estate Token is Considered a Security
A tokenized real estate asset is typically classified as a security if it meets one or more of the following conditions:
Direct ownership representation (Token represents a title deed or land registry entry in the owner’s name)
Not a Security
The token only represents ownership rights and does not involve investment pooling or profit-sharing.
Fractional ownership of property (Tokenized shares in a real estate holding company)
Security
Investors own fractions of the property via a structured investment vehicle.
Revenue-sharing token (Token grants rights to rental income or profit distributions)
Security
The token functions as an investment contract with passive income distribution.
Real estate-backed debt tokens (Token represents a loan secured by property)
Security
Functions as a debt instrument subject to financial regulations.
Utility token with no investment feature (Token provides access to property services but does not grant ownership or profits)
Not a Security
The token does not represent investment participation.
If tokens function as a way to attract investors, distribute profits, or allow third-party reliance for management and financial returns, they are classified as securities in most jurisdictions.
Key Considerations for Token Issuers
If a real estate token is likely to be classified as a security, issuers must ensure full compliance with securities laws. This includes:
Registering or obtaining an exemption from the relevant financial regulator (e.g., SEC, FCA, MAS, FINMA).
Complying with investor protection regulations, such as AML/KYC requirements and financial disclosures.
Ensuring proper licensing for the issuance and trading of security tokens.
Selecting a jurisdiction with clear regulations to minimize legal risks and optimize tax efficiency.
Failure to properly classify and comply with securities regulations can result in legal penalties, restricted market access, or invalidation of the token offering.
Final Determination: Does the Tokenized Asset Meet the Legal Definition of a Security?
A tokenized real estate asset may or may not be classified as a security depending on its structure. The key determining factors are:
If the token represents ownership without investment elements → Not a Security
If the token represents an investment contract with profit expectations → Security
Legal and regulatory analysis should be conducted before issuing real estate-backed tokens to determine their classification and compliance obligations.
Last updated
Was this helpful?