Tax Considerations in Tokenized Asset Issuance
Tax efficiency is a core consideration in structuring any Security Token Offering (STO). Issuers must account for tax obligations across three levels:
Where the asset is located
Where the issuing entity (SPV/SPC) is established
Where investors reside
Understanding the tax implications in each of these domains is critical to maintaining compliance, maximizing investor returns, and optimizing the overall structure of the tokenized asset.
Key Areas of Tax Exposure
Income Tax on Revenue-Generating Assets
Recurring income from rental properties, royalties, or operating businesses is typically taxed in the country where the asset is located. If the SPV receives this income, corporate tax may also apply in the issuing jurisdiction—unless it operates as a tax-transparent vehicle or under a treaty-exempt structure.
Capital Gains Tax on Asset or Token Sale
Gains realized from the sale of the underlying asset or appreciation in token value may be taxed:
At the SPV level (if the SPV sells the asset)
At the investor level (if the investor sells tokens at a profit)
The applicable rate depends on both the SPV jurisdiction and the investor's tax residency.
Withholding Tax on Distributions
Dividends or revenue payouts to token holders may be subject to withholding tax in the SPV’s jurisdiction, particularly for cross-border distributions. Tax treaties can reduce or eliminate this obligation.
Transaction-Based Taxes (Stamp Duty, VAT)
Some jurisdictions impose taxes on the transfer of tokenized assets:
Stamp duties may apply to equity or real estate-backed tokens.
VAT may apply to tokenized commodities or non-financial products.
Most financial securities, however, are exempt from VAT in token-friendly jurisdictions.
Investor-Level Reporting
Investors may be required to report and pay taxes on:
Capital gains from token sales
Dividend or interest income
Foreign digital asset holdings under CRS or FATCA regulations
Tax Impact Matrix (Select Jurisdictions)
British Virgin Islands (BVI)
No
No
No
No
Yes (based on investor residency)
Liechtenstein
Yes (12.5%)
Yes
Depends on treaty
Exempt (financial instruments)
Yes
Switzerland
Yes (federal & cantonal)
Yes
Yes (subject to treaty)
Exempt for regulated securities
Yes
Germany
Yes (15% + trade tax)
Yes
Yes (26.375%, treaty reduction possible)
Yes (VAT-exempt for financial securities)
Yes
France
Yes
Yes
Yes (12.8% withholding)
Yes (if non-financial)
Yes
Best Practices for Tax-Efficient Tokenization
Incorporate SPV in a tax-neutral or treaty-favorable jurisdiction
Reduces income and withholding tax exposure
Use transparent or pass-through structures
Avoids double taxation at the SPV level
Align distribution models with treaty structures
Minimizes cross-border withholding tax
Educate investors on their reporting obligations
Ensures compliance and reduces reputational risk
Engage local counsel and tax advisors
Avoids penalties and ensures treaty benefits apply
Key Insight for Issuers
Tax is not just a back-office concern — it’s a strategic lever in token design. Optimizing tax at the asset, SPV, and investor levels helps maximize net returns and reduce friction in cross-border offerings.
Was this helpful?